Compare Harvest vs Scoro vs Asana

No Reviews

No Reviews

• Easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for non-technical users and teams of varying technical expertise.

• Streamlines time tracking with features like desktop apps, browser extensions, mobile apps, and integrations (e.g., ClickUp, JIRA, Asana, Google Calendar).

• Effective invoicing system directly tied to tracked time and expenses, reducing manual errors and improving efficiency.

• Robust reporting features, giving insights into employee utilization, project budgets, and team productivity.

• Limited reporting capabilities, making it challenging for complex data analysis and large organizations.

• Some users report lag during integrations and syncing tasks with tools like Asana, Trello, and Google Calendar.

• Freemium version lacks advanced capabilities, requiring users to upgrade for full functionality.

• UI can be perceived as overly simple or rigid, with limited customization options for notifications or project attributes.

• Centralizes workflow management, bringing tasks, quotations, invoicing, project tracking, and time tracking into one platform.

• Simplifies project and task management with an intuitive and user-friendly interface.

• Efficient integration with tools like Xero, APIs, and calendars for seamless workflows.

• Offers robust reporting features, clear visual tracking (e.g., Gantt charts, sales pipelines), and customizable modules for better task prioritization and forecasting.

• Steeper learning curve for new users due to the comprehensive feature set, requiring time for familiarization and onboarding.

• Occasional bugs or slow performance issues that may disrupt workflows.

• Comments and collaboration features are not as robust as expected for team interactions.

• Limited integrations with additional tools or external apps beyond the current ecosystem, restricting functionality expansion.