spotsaas-logo
Get Listed

Compare CircleCI vs ACCELQ

CircleCI - Continuous Integration Software
Get Quote
Get Quote
ACCELQ - Continuous Integration Software
Get Quote
Get Quote

Overview

Description

CircleCI is a hosted continuous integration service for building and testing software. It supports multiple languages. CircleCI includes direct project management, traceability, code ... Read More

accelQ is a continuous integration software that is completely integrated in a web browser and hosted. The intranet-based solution lets engineering teams instantly start using it and the ... Read More

Entry Level Pricing
  • Starts from $39
  • Not Available
Free Trial Availability
Spotsaas Score

9.8/10

8.7/10

User Ratings

4.6

(84)
Get Quote
Get Quote

Software Demo

Demo

View demo

View demo

Features

Total Features

6 Features

4 Features

Unique Features
      Get Quote
      Get Quote

      Pricing

      Pricing Option
          Starting From
          • $39
          • Not Available
          Pricing Plans
          • Not Available
          • Not Available

          Other Details

          Organization Types supported
          • Large Enterprises
          • Freelancers
          • Small Business
          • Individuals
          • Medium Business
          • Large Enterprises
          • Freelancers
          • Small Business
          • Individuals
          • Medium Business
          Platforms Supported
          • Browser Based (Cloud)
          • Mobile - iOS
          • Installed - Windows
          • Mobile - Android
          • Installed - Mac
          • Browser Based (Cloud)
          • Browser Based (Cloud)
          • Mobile - iOS
          • Installed - Windows
          • Mobile - Android
          • Installed - Mac
          • Browser Based (Cloud)
          Modes of support
          • 24/7 (Live rep)
          • Business Hours
          • Online
          • 24/7 (Live rep)
          • Business Hours
          • Online
          API Support
          • Available
          • Available
          Get Quote
          Get Quote

          User Reviews

          User Ratings
          Rating Distribution

          Excellent

          187

          Very Good

          84

          Good

          12

          Poor

          0

          Terible

          0

          Excellent

          26

          Very Good

          4

          Good

          0

          Poor

          0

          Terible

          0

          Expert's Review generated by AI

          CircleCI is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface, real-time project insights, and seamless integration with various build hosts, making it a standout choice for CI operations. The free ...Read more

          ACCELQ stands out as a top-tier codeless automation tool with a plethora of strengths, as echoed by satisfied users. The seamless implementation process, coupled with codeless automation ...Read more

          Pros and Cons
          • Provides a user-friendly interface with unique features like insights for workflows, job branches, and commit history.

          • Free tier includes substantial credits, easy to integrate into projects, and allows SSH to resolve issues directly in the build machine.

          • Offers easy interface for pipeline creation using YAML files, facilitating automation and progress tracking.

          • Excellent documentation and ease of integration with other technologies for users transitioning from DevOps/Sysadmin roles.

          • Robust as a Continuous Integration tool with well-documented features, including Orbs implementations.

          • Audit features are not as robust as other enterprise-grade providers, and some users found the setup to be complex initially.

          • Issues related to Docker layer cache credits running out fast and slow servers have been reported.

          • Limited customization options and challenges in recreating complex pipelines for testing during development.

          • Codeless automation simplifies testing and makes automation accessible to non-developers.

          • Easy element identification and intuitive user interface enhance ease of use.

          • Support for a variety of testing types (UI, API, database) provides comprehensive test coverage.

          • Self-healing capabilities and AI-based automation features increase efficiency and speed.

          • No coding skills required, making it easy for functional testers to upskill in automation.

          • Limited ecosystem for additional apps and connectors may limit advanced functionalities.

          • Richness of features and customizations can be overwhelming for new users without adequate support.

          Positive Reviews

          No reviews available for the product

          No reviews available for the product

          Customers

          Customers

          No Customers information available.

          Pfizer

          Pfizer

          Intel

          Intel

          Intuit

          Intuit

          Media and Screenshots

          Screenshots
          screenshots

          3 Screenshots

          Section execute debug track

          3 Screenshots

          Videos
          video-0

          3 Videos

          video-0

          2 Videos

          Alternatives

          Alternatives

          Add to Compare

          Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

          Stuck on something? We're here to help with all the questions and answers in one place.

          Yes, both CircleCI and ACCELQ offer a Free Trial.

          CircleCI is designed for Large Enterprises, Medium Business and Small Business.

          ACCELQ is designed for Large Enterprises, Medium Business and Small Business.

          The starting price of CircleCI begins at $39/Month, while pricing details for ACCELQ are unavailable.

          Some top alternatives to CircleCI includes Codeship, Semaphore, GitLab, Bamboo, AutoRABIT CI, Buildkite, CloudBees Core, Travis CI, AppVeyor and Bitbucket.

          Some top alternatives to ACCELQ includes Probo.CI, Testsigma, mabl, CloudQA, Katalon Studio, Cypress.io, Testim, Tricentis Tosca, UiPath RPA and Automaton.

          Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].