Compare ACCELQ vs Cypress.io

Overview

Key features

Pricing

Other Details

User reviews

Integratons

Media & Screenshots

Alternatives

	ACCELQ (30) Get Quote Get Quote	Cypress.io (82) Get Quote Get Quote

Overview
Affiliate Disclosure

Description	accelQ is a continuous integration software that is completely integrated in a web browser and hosted. The intranet-based solution lets engineering teams instantly start using it and the ... Read More	Cypress is a an end-to-end testing tool for web apps that makes software teams more productive by reducing the time spent on testing and debugging. With Cypress, test case creation becomes ... Read More
Free Trial Availability	Get Free Trial	No free trial
Spotsaas Score	8.7/10	9.0/10
User Ratings	4.6 (84)	4.8 (83)
	Get Quote	Get Quote

Software Demo

Demo	View demo	View demo

Features

Total Features	4 Features	11 Features
Unique Features
	Get Quote	Get Quote

Pricing

Pricing Option
Pricing Plans	Not Available	Not Available
	View detailed pricing	View detailed pricing

Other Details

Organization Types supported	Small Business Large Enterprises Medium Business Freelancers Individuals	Small Business Large Enterprises Medium Business Freelancers Individuals
Platforms Supported	Browser Based (Cloud) Installed - Mac Installed - Windows Mobile - iOS Mobile - Android Browser Based (Cloud)	Browser Based (Cloud) Installed - Mac Installed - Windows Mobile - iOS Mobile - Android Browser Based (Cloud)
Modes of support	24/7 (Live rep) Business Hours Online	24/7 (Live rep) Business Hours Online
API Support	Available	Available
	Get Quote	Get Quote

User Reviews

User Ratings	4.6 (based on 84 reviews)	4.8 (based on 83 reviews)
Rating Distribution	Excellent 26 Very Good 4 Good 0 Poor 0 Terible 0	Excellent 78 Very Good 4 Good 0 Poor 0 Terible 0
Expert's Review generated by AI	ACCELQ stands out as a top-tier codeless automation tool with a plethora of strengths, as echoed by satisfied users. The seamless implementation process, coupled with codeless automation ...Read more	Cypress stands out as a top-notch tool for advanced software testing, earning high praise for its numerous strengths. Users appreciate its easy setup, fast test execution, real-time reloading, ...Read more
Pros and Cons	Codeless automation simplifies testing and makes automation accessible to non-developers. Easy element identification and intuitive user interface enhance ease of use. Support for a variety of testing types (UI, API, database) provides comprehensive test coverage. Self-healing capabilities and AI-based automation features increase efficiency and speed. No coding skills required, making it easy for functional testers to upskill in automation. Limited ecosystem for additional apps and connectors may limit advanced functionalities. Richness of features and customizations can be overwhelming for new users without adequate support.	Cypress is praised for its easy setup, fast test execution, real-time reloading, and debugging capabilities, automating waiting and retrying. Users appreciate Cypress for its intuitive API, excellent documentation, and community support, making it easy to learn and use even for non-developers. Cypress is highly regarded for its stability and automation, allowing for quick and efficient testing of applications. The tool offers powerful test capabilities, speeds up test runs, simplifies debugging, and integrates well with Node.js for testing APIs. Users appreciate the ability to run tests in real-time in a browser, providing visibility into test suites and issue identification. Some users find the lack of cross-browser support, specifically for Firefox and Safari, limiting and look forward to future integration for broader compatibility. Organizations with users accustomed to traditional Selenium-based tools may face resistance to adopting Cypress due to familiarity with existing solutions. A few users mention a learning curve for incorporating Cypress into their testing workflow, particularly when dealing with more complex testing scenarios.
Positive Reviews	No reviews available for the product	No reviews available for the product
	Read reviews	Read reviews

Integrations

Integration with other apps	Jira 4.4 (17380 reviews) BrowserStack 3.4 (243 reviews) Sauce Labs 4.6 (140 reviews)	GitHub 4.6 (7709 reviews) GitLab 4.4 (1610 reviews) Slack 4.5 (35011 reviews)

Customers

Customers	Pfizer Intel Intuit	Siemens Codepen DHL

Media and Screenshots

Screenshots	3 Screenshots	5 Screenshots
Videos	2 Videos	2 Videos

Alternatives

Alternatives	Probo.CI 4.1 Testsigma 4.5 mabl 4.4	Provar 4.4 Screenster 4.6 LambdaTest 4.7

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Stuck on something? We're here to help with all the questions and answers in one place.

ACCELQ offers Free Trial, but Cypress.io does not.

ACCELQ is designed for Large Enterprises, Medium Business and Small Business.

Cypress.io is designed for Freelancers, Large Enterprises, Medium Business and Small Business.

Pricing details for both ACCELQ and Cypress.io are unavailable at this time. Contact the respective providers for more information.

Some top alternatives to ACCELQ includes Probo.CI, Testsigma, mabl, CloudQA, Katalon Studio, Cypress.io, Testim, Tricentis Tosca, UiPath RPA and Automaton.

Some top alternatives to Cypress.io includes Provar, Screenster, LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, TestingBot, Endtest, Testissimo, Testim, Firelab and BugBug.

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].

Compare ACCELQ vs Cypress.io

ACCELQ

Cypress.io

OverviewAffiliate Disclosure

Software Demo

Features

Pricing

Other Details

User Reviews

Integrations

Customers

Media and Screenshots

Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Overview
Affiliate Disclosure