Ziflow

Streamlines the proofing process and enhances collaboration among multiple teams, making it easy to communicate changes and feedback.

Intuitive and user-friendly interface, allowing for quick adoption by both internal and external users.

Enables precise feedback with tools like markings, checklists, timestamps, and threaded comments.

Centralizes feedback to avoid scattered emails and conflicting opinions, providing a consolidated platform for reviews.

Supports a variety of file formats, such as videos, PDFs, images, and digital content, catering to diverse project needs.

Version control and history tracking feature ensures all changes are documented and accessible.

Improves efficiency by eliminating manual errors, reducing the back-and-forth communication in review processes.

Enhances productivity by automating workflows, setting deadlines, and providing customized notifications for stakeholders.

Provides ease of sharing proofs with clients, enabling clear edits and timely feedback.

Offers robust project management tools, customizable templates, and multi-stage options for tailored workflow setups.

Some users might find the platform overwhelming initially, especially when uploading multiple files, but familiarity grows with use.

Pricing can be a concern for organizations requiring multiple users or advanced features, potentially limiting scalability.

Certain customizations and branding options are limited, impacting the ability to create fully branded experiences.

Lack of certain features on lower-tier plans, such as the ability to delete comments or send custom messages with proofs, might affect user experience.

Inconsistencies like tags sometimes not being placed correctly or difficulties in finding some tools within the platform might pose occasional challenges.

Limited selection in the Marketplace for additional apps and connectors, restricting advanced functionalities.

Mobile functionality might be lacking compared to desktop usage, potentially affecting user experience for on-the-go requirements.

Waiting for upstream changes based on specific user actions might cause delays or inconvenience for urgent modifications.

Preferential for enhancing features like turning off and on layers, or adding social media templates for proofing, to further expand functionalities.

The absence of features on certain tiers, like the ability to upload specific file formats directly, might inconvenience users with such requirements.