Rainforest QA

Great testing partner with continue improvement

What do you like best? When I start using this service I noticed that they really work based on the feedback of the testers and users, we noticed that it offers a valuable input on the release, the integration testing was the cherry over the cake to ensure quality. What do you dislike? sometimes on creating the tests it should consider to write it very clearly and direct instructions, the tricky part it that in some cases it could be difficult to run a test when it could be executed ...

Like Automation with a Human Touch

What do you like best? There are many things. The interface is easy to use and every update has only been an improvement. It's always easy to get a hold of support and have them look at a problem. When I start a test suite, they begin testing immediately, and results start coming through while it's in progress. The amount of detail that is included in my test results–tester comments, video, screenshot. The personal attention of the support team and their willingness to explore a variety ...

Great long-term testing support

What do you like best? Rainforest really allows you to scale your QA team with its fleet of testers. The UX and workflows are super easy to setup, and their debugging tools are top notch. What do you dislike? Rainforest isn't a drop-in replacement for the entire QA function. Be prepared to dedicate at least one full-time QA lead to manage the overall effort, otherwise you can get a very disorganized test suite. Recommendations to others considering the product: Plan out a ...

Rainforest has been a tedious yet rewarding product to use.

What do you like best? The ability to get accurate results and not have to use our own resources to do so. What do you dislike? The length of time it takes to create accurate tests. Recommendations to others considering the product: Watch the tutorials and reference the documentation to get started. Also, if you use embedded tests ensure you have the right ones. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Testing on Android devices.

Manual web app testing via mechanical turk

What do you like best? We have been using Rainforest for over 2 years. It is an affordable way to outsource the manual QA testing of short workflows in our web application. Also excellent support and communication with Rainforest staff, they bend over backwards to make sure you are happy. What do you dislike? There can often be false positives (meaning, a bug or exception is reported when the system is actually working) for some random reasons that have to do with the testers getting ...

Establish E2E UI Test Coverage Quickly

What do you like best? Writing tests in Rainforest QA is super simple because it's done in plain english and does not require technical expertise, which makes it quick and easy for anyone to get started. The customer support provided through their website via intercom is very responsive 24 hours a day, and the CSMs are friendly and extremely responsive via email as well. What do you dislike? Occasionally the manual testers can be a source of false positives and negatives due to a ...

Simply the best way to get your website testing

What do you like best? fast and efficient way to get you site tested, it takes about 30 minutes to write and run the test ,,and results are instant,,save lots of time of professional testers What do you dislike? nothing much as the company is still developing so need improvements What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? AS a client of company we save about 50% of our time finding bugs in the website,

Automated testing, but with the benefit of humans!

What do you like best? Rainforest QA can best be thought of as a UI-driven functional system test automation service. The fact that real humans are executing the test scripts is a benefit in that it allows for easy detection of unanticipated errors or display issues. Because test runs are an "embarrassingly parallel" problem, a full test run takes no more than the duration of the longest manual run in a set, which itself may not take significantly longer than a custom-built Selenium run. ...

Solid tool for small teams

What do you like best? The tests are easy to write, robust, and can be deployed to multiple browser type What do you dislike? There is some work needed for the diversity of iOS devices and iOS browsers. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? We have a strong engineering team but don't have budget for a QA team, RFQA solves that issues

Rainforest increases engineering confidence and shortens product development lifecyle

What do you like best? Faster development process and reduction of bugs in our product releases through easy test creation and maintenance. Our developers can write tests as they code to ensure good coverage. What do you dislike? Occasional false positives due to tester misunderstanding or not following instructions correctly. UI can use some improvements when navigating between tests. Recommendations to others considering the product: The Rainforest CSM team is a great resource ...