spotsaas-logo
Get Listed
MuleSoft Anypoint Connectors - iPaaS Software

MuleSoft Anypoint Connectors Reviews in April 2025: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Bridge any system with our versatile connectors.

4.3

Add to compare

MuleSoft Anypoint Connectors offers custom pricing plan

Request a Quote

MuleSoft Anypoint Connectors Reviews & Ratings

4.3

Very Good

Based on 596 ratings & 169 reviews

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(121)

Very Good

(40)

Good

(7)

Poor

(0)

Terible

(1)

Log in Required to View Reviews

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 61-70 out of 169

MJ

megha j

03/09/19

4.5 out of 5

Mules is best esb i have worked on. It is easy to use with help of good documentation mule provided.

What do you like best? Tutoraial and courses are very detailed and helpful for beginners. Transformers are very strong component in mule4. easy plug and play of custom connectors is very good feature to have.Also cloudhub is very rich to fulfil requirement of an application. What do you dislike? Sometimes unpredicted behaviour in anypoint studio. Recommendations to others considering the product: Recommended to use What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits ...

Read more

VN

Vijay N

03/07/19

4 out of 5

Integration Architect

What do you like best? Anypoint Platform is very good platform having large collection of different connectors to connect and integrate diverse systems.We can say it can almost connect anything and it is really lightweight and easy to use when we compare with other ESB. What do you dislike? Logging needs to be improved while debugging Dataweaver script. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Web services, Application integration and B2B ...

Read more

WJ

Wilson Jan S

03/07/19

5 out of 5

Achieves Center of enablement

What do you like best? It is very easy to implement, design an API that can be reused to other mule applications. Mulesoft provides a cleaner way of implementing API's, management of API's and follows a standad to make it maintaiable, scalable and efficie What do you dislike? The Anypoint Studio and Platform keeps on updating, which makes the course in training outdated. Also, in Studio, sometimes we need to restart the IDE or the software itself for it to work. JVM runtime fails in ...

Read more

LA

Luke A

03/04/19

4 out of 5

Big team performance with small team

What do you like best? By far the biggest advantage I found over other platforms is the Anypoint Studio and the online Design Studio. Together they enable quick and easy design and development of apps and API which would take substantially longer to develop. What do you dislike? The integration between design studio, Anypoint studio and CloudHub still needs refinement so that they feel one product. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? ...

Read more

UI

User in Automotive

03/03/19

5 out of 5

I started learning MuleSoft and targetting to attempt certifications

What do you like best? Connectors, DataWeave and other Transformers What do you dislike? OSV2 size and TPS limitations where the size limit is only 10 MB per key Recommendations to others considering the product: nA What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Started working on the project with automotive domain

EP

Eduardo P

03/02/19

5 out of 5

Grear tool

What do you like best? Documentation is very extensive and deployment is also eqsy and hundreds of conectors What do you dislike? Anypoint Studio is still very buggy and should be improved Recommendations to others considering the product: Go for it if suits your needs What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Exposing APIs and ESB functions

SB

Sowjanya B

03/01/19

4.5 out of 5

MULE ESB usage

What do you like best? 1) Preview option in Dataweave transformer component is best to me. As I need not run the incomplete application to verify the logic built in Dataweave at the time of development. Just providing the mocked input I can verify the logic in Dataweave. 2) Build and unit test time of the interfaces are reduced by 50% in comparison to my previous too. What do you dislike? Handling of various types of exceptions is tedious task. When my interface has various ...

Read more

D

Dennie M

03/01/19

4.5 out of 5

extensive but Fast Platform

What do you like best? development is easy despite the fact that a lot is possible. Also the fact that there is an automatic marketplace creation What do you dislike? we have been using mulesoft for almost a year and nothing found yet What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? creation and introduction of API's

NR

Nasser R

03/01/19

3.5 out of 5

Started enthousiast, now hmmm

What do you like best? MuleSoft as an integration tool provider What do you dislike? To many changes in to short time without realizing impact on usage by clients What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? We started with MuleSoft as an integration platform, and are now using it to provide our companie's services as an API to public (paying customers)

AL

Alberto L

03/01/19

3 out of 5

Good Integration Tool, big room for improvement

What do you like best? the Design View, the online platform (especially the Runtime Manager with the monitoring tools). The RAML-based APIkit router proved to be in particular very useful by automatically implement basic url/request validation without additional code. The DataWeave language is extremely powerful. What do you dislike? There doesn't seem to be a clear way to use Splitter Aggregator in an asynchronous way (not at least with version 3.x.x of the platform). MUnit ...

Read more