Imagekit.io Reviews in April 2025: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Its a very good option to host my images, its a little bit slower than cloudinary but it is useful.

What do you like best? The conversion of the images is very fast, the interface its also easy to handle. What do you dislike? The page speed its a little bit slower thar cloudinary, but cloudinary stopped working on my wordpress a weeks ago, and the resolution of the images i think that its a litlle bit low. Recommendations to others considering the product: Keep your images in good resolution and in webp format What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits ...

Very good service & Great Customer Support

What do you like best? Grate Customer Support. They responded my email right away What do you dislike? It's odd that they don't support special characters by default What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Image optimization

MZ IK review

What do you like best? First, it is fast and for me, that is more that I need, second I can use webp image formats, third http/2 protocol, fourth my personal website is faster with imagekit... That is all for now. What do you dislike? For now, I do not have dislike things but we gonna see... What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? My personal website is faster... images are loading faster

Easy to implement, powerful enough to be useful

What do you like best? I'm not a developer but I was able to use imagekit with basic html skills. It has saved me a ton of bandwidth and more importantly, it has made my pages load faster which makes my customers happy. I've also been very happy with the level of support provided - I've been able to further optimize my images by quite a bit with the help of the imagekit support team. What do you dislike? Nothing standsout to dislike in my opinion. Imagekit does what I was looking ...

Great image performance solution

What do you like best? Endpoints connected to non-static image sources. This enables us to do some really cool & fast dynamic image generation. Without Imagekit, our dynamic images would be not very performant, which leads to an overall slower website experience. What do you dislike? It's not so easy to understand where are we using all our bandwidth within ImageKit. ImageKit dashboard provides have a monthly view with the highest consumption resources, but as we try to adjust things, ...

Simple, time saving and effective

What do you like best? Simple steps to make my client's website load faster without having to optimise every single media file manually What do you dislike? I was a little confused about integrating it - probably because it seemed so simple. The support team reached out and helped me to sort it out Recommendations to others considering the product: If you're tearing your hair out trying to improve the load speed of your website and your web vitals in Google Search Console are ...

A great product! It's young, and it shows, but everything it does, it does it right.

What do you like best? The fact that is optimizes image format based on the client requesting it is very clever and useful. Makes things like cross browser support much easier. The support team answers fast, and takes feedback about the product very seriously. Also, doing transformations on read, instead of write, makes the product a lot more versatile, and lowers operational costs, while allowing each image to be perfectly tailored for each particular scenario. What do you dislike? ...

Really free and easy to set up

What do you like best? ImageKit.io is 100% free. Really 100% free, works fine and set-up is very easy, just 2 seconds to start. What do you dislike? Custom URL would be great in free mode, also a starter cheap subscription would be great Recommendations to others considering the product: it's free and easy to use What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Image CDN

More then 1k images served from imageKit

What do you like best? I have a blog site, which have around 2000 images and growing. Out of it 1K are served by imageKit and other 1K served by a competitor. I don't see any difference between the two and the images are loaded super-fast. But the one great difference is that imageKit only consumes 110 MB bandwidth, in comparison to 2.11 GB by the competitor. What do you dislike? Nothing as their is no downside in using imagekit and planning to add more images for my website in it. ...

ImageKit has greatly improved the performance of our site.

What do you like best? ImageKit has one of the fastest and easiest to use setups for uploading assets via the GUI. Which makes the most sense for our use case. What do you dislike? I do wish the default view was a little easier to manage large media libraries. But overall it has been really solid. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? We use ImageKit to host our assets. The biggest benefit is the built in optimziations and ability to ...