AppVeyor Reviews in April 2025: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Used it for unit-testing a Python package on Windows

What do you like best? It is easy to set up and maintain, independently of other CI services. Also, it hooks well with Github pull requests. What do you dislike? The free tier of the service is very slow and makes merging of PRs a little painful. Recommendations to others considering the product: AppVeyor is great for managing pull requests, but it is too slow for an active local development team. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? ...

Great for any Windows Builds

What do you like best? We've been using AppVeyor for over a year. We recently jumped up to 5 concurrent jobs, which really helps speed up our matrix builds. Pricing is simple. Support is superb. I really like that they have an integrated NuGet feed. We use it for build dependences and Chocolatey software installs. Setting up environments to deploy web app builds to Azure App Service is simple. Many developers at our company use AppVeyor for their open source projects too, so they are ...

Very useful for Python developers

What do you like best? The best feature of AppVeyor is they allow *any* artefacts to be captured from the build and downloaded easily from Appveyor. This is a big feature over Travis, which has a recipe for using Amazon S3 to store artefacts, but that turns out to be quite expensive for very active projects. What do you dislike? No support for Github organisation authorisation. Slow builds for free accounts. Protection of environment variables is sub-optimal. Several times a ...

Quality Continuous Integration for the .NET Projects

What do you like best? Generally fast build queue. We have multiple projects and when we're pushing out features rapidly it's nice to have the builds not pile up so we get immediate feedback if the build breaks. What do you dislike? The setup / configuration of a project is complex. We generally have .NET applications so using the MS Build process works well for those. We haven't yet configured a Node application successfully and are still relying on deployment using GitHub hooks. ...

AppVeyor: CI for Windows

What do you like best? I cannot find any other alternative for running tests on Windows What do you dislike? It is somehow slow. Sometimes it can take hours waiting for a job to get started. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Finally I have my tests running not only on Linux & Mac but also on Windows.

Great option for OSS projects to test in a Windows environment

What do you like best? Convenient configuration file format similar to travis, GitHub build status API integration, plenty of pre-installed software for testing environments. What do you dislike? Builds can sometimes be a bit slower than competitors. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Open source repositories to which I contribute need a way to test their software in a Windows environment (for free!) and ensure that everything works as ...

CI system for windows based builds

What do you like best? Language and framework support. Every problem that I have with travis, appveyor solves it. I tried a c++ project and setting it up to use a proper compiler was a breeze as appveyor comes with standard msvc and mingw compiler suites, ruby, python and most common languages are well supported. Builds started almost right away and showed up in the console whenever I pushed to github and the builds were very fast too. The web-ui is pretty slick and barebones, but it ...

Easy continuous integration testing on windows

What do you like best? - Ease of setup - Capability to develop test configuration interactively online - Availability of compilers and tool chains What do you dislike? Probably my biggest complaint is the relatively high latency of builds. After a commit it takes a fairly long time before builds start. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? I've used appveyor to implement continuous integration testing for several of my open source ...

Only free hosted CI server for Windows, very customizable

What do you like best? 1. Builds on Windows, essential for cross-platform applications 2. Free for open-source projects 3. Allows downloading compiled files, ready for distribution - called "Artifacts" 4. Very good integration with everything Windows - Nuget, Visual Studio, Azure and well documented. What do you dislike? 1. Windows-only - A really cross-platform free CI server is very necessary to stop writing similar but different config files for separate Windows and linux ...

Fantastic tool for continuous delivery

What do you like best? AppVeyor, with a simple Yaml config, will really help your team build and deploy on various environments. Complete console output helps you find problem when someone... breaks the build! What do you dislike? Lately, AppVayor had suffered from its growing popularity, and weird problems have occurred, making builds fail for no apparent reason. Their team has fixed most of them I would say, and things seem to be back to normal. Recommendations to others ...