AppVeyor

Used it for unit-testing a Python package on Windows

What do you like best? It is easy to set up and maintain, independently of other CI services. Also, it hooks well with Github pull requests. What do you dislike? The free tier of the service is very slow and makes merging of PRs a little painful. Recommendations to others considering the product: AppVeyor is great for managing pull requests, but it is too slow for an active local development team. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? ...

Very useful for Python developers

What do you like best? The best feature of AppVeyor is they allow *any* artefacts to be captured from the build and downloaded easily from Appveyor. This is a big feature over Travis, which has a recipe for using Amazon S3 to store artefacts, but that turns out to be quite expensive for very active projects. What do you dislike? No support for Github organisation authorisation. Slow builds for free accounts. Protection of environment variables is sub-optimal. Several times a ...

Easy continuous integration testing on windows

What do you like best? - Ease of setup - Capability to develop test configuration interactively online - Availability of compilers and tool chains What do you dislike? Probably my biggest complaint is the relatively high latency of builds. After a commit it takes a fairly long time before builds start. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? I've used appveyor to implement continuous integration testing for several of my open source ...

Only free hosted CI server for Windows, very customizable

What do you like best? 1. Builds on Windows, essential for cross-platform applications 2. Free for open-source projects 3. Allows downloading compiled files, ready for distribution - called "Artifacts" 4. Very good integration with everything Windows - Nuget, Visual Studio, Azure and well documented. What do you dislike? 1. Windows-only - A really cross-platform free CI server is very necessary to stop writing similar but different config files for separate Windows and linux ...

Cloud-based Continuous Integration and Deployment for .NET Development with AppVeyor

What do you like best? For our solution we liked the ease of use AppVeyor gave us with the Microsoft .NET technology stack. There are similar products, but few that excel with this stack. As AppVeyor states, '#1 Continuous Delivery service for Windows'. I wrote a post on our POC at https://programmaticponderings.wordpress.com/2014/05/25/cloud-based-continuous-integration-and-delivery-for-net-development. What do you dislike? There was very little to dislike. We first tested AppVeyor ...

A simple service that ensures the integrity of your code

What do you like best? AppVeyor is virtually a turnkey solution for continuous integration and build automation. It's easy to configure to handle continuous integration. It has Github integration and giving it access to your repository is almost a one-click process. Github teams are supported as well, allowing people to maintain individual accounts to avoid sharing of accounts. Build times are short and logs are provided. We also don't seem to have run into any bandwidth issues, so ...

A really good integration system

What do you like best? It's simple and gorgeous. The build dashboard is impressive and comforting. It can add tests, and identify artifacts (results of the build) and act on them. You can automate deployment to whatever environment you like. Impressively, AppVeyor restores NuGet packages as well. It's a great example of Software as a Service AppVeyor says they "automate building, testing and deployment of .NET applications helping your team to focus on delivering great apps." Cool. ...

Pretty good for windows builds and python developers!!

What do you like best? Well, Firstly, its free for open source projects. A good CI build that includes build, test, and deploy means that you don't have to fear your code. When compared to Travis CI which is expensive for active projects, artifacts here are easily available. However for database CI AppVeyor has the major advantage that it comes with a SQL Server database on the build agents by default. This significantly simplifies the setup and avoids the need to provision, setup and ...

Great option for OSS projects to test in a Windows environment

What do you like best? Convenient configuration file format similar to travis, GitHub build status API integration, plenty of pre-installed software for testing environments. What do you dislike? Builds can sometimes be a bit slower than competitors. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Open source repositories to which I contribute need a way to test their software in a Windows environment (for free!) and ensure that everything works as ...

AppVeyor: CI for Windows

What do you like best? I cannot find any other alternative for running tests on Windows What do you dislike? It is somehow slow. Sometimes it can take hours waiting for a job to get started. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Finally I have my tests running not only on Linux & Mac but also on Windows.