Compare Neo4j Graph Database vs TigerGraph

No Reviews

No Reviews

• Comprehensive tools and resources like the Bloom browser, desktop client, and Python tutorials for easy adoption.

• Rich connector ecosystem for APIs, data sources, and data science capabilities.

• Speed of execution compared to relational databases.

• Strong focus on relationship storage, suitable for tracking assets and relationships.

• Flexible, scalable, and cloud-compatible native graph database with ACID compliance.

• Some features, like live-backup and role model, are limited to the enterprise version.

• Upgrading between Neo4j versions can be cumbersome and error-prone.

• Limited support for beginners in knowing when to use the graph database over other solutions.

• TigerGraph's GSQL is designed to resemble SQL, which benefits users with SQL experience.

• Extensive documentation and support resources provided by TigerGraph aid in the learning process.

• TigerGraph offers exceptional performance, scalability, and analytical power, making it a preferred choice for graph databases.

• TigerGraph Cloud provides a powerful platform with GraphStudio UI, easing the transition for newcomers into the graph world.

• TigerGraph's powerful graph database technology offers fast query performance, flexibility, and advanced analytics capabilities.

• The absence of search options in the user interface can be disappointing for users considering the tools' capabilities.

• Limited selection in the Marketplace for additional apps and connectors may restrict advanced functionalities for some users.